Here is a "theory" on how to get infinite energy. It seems that my post was deleted probably because the image I put on here was too large. So I'm providing the image as an attachment.

I need to know if this is even plausible. If my posts are being deleted to suppress this information. Make me aware so I don't waste my time trying to post it again.

In another words, I don't know if this post was deleted to make the public unaware of the possibility, or if I messed up on the posting.

Its just I've already posted this once. And for w/e reason its not in the topic list.

So now I'm going to attempt to post again. If it gets removed again, ill just take the theory elsewhere for confirmation.

Thanks In Advance - To any and all who ponder at the idea of infinite energy.

E2E

I looked at the diagram. Neglecting the energy that you use to start the process, it looks like a number of schemes that rely on giving a short pulse to keep the process going for the rest of the cycle. These "inventions" all ignore the fact that the short "push" always requires more total energy than you get back. Often there will be a capacitor to store the charge in these systems. You can Google a company called Lutec, that claims their motor/generator puts out 4 times the power in. As with ALL the claims on "over-unity" motors, there are NEVER any working models for sale, even though a person who could publicly demonstrate one, would become rich almost overnight. If you can make a working model, take it to any T.V. station. I'm sure they'll be more than happy to show off a working perpetual motion machine. Good luck.

Isn't this what the Wankel Motor idea is? Basically, except that your fathers system uses permanent magnets instead of steel to attract the rotor. in this case your spinning the spiral. Check out an article by Walter et. al. called "Introducing the Practice of Asymmetrical Regauging to Increase the Coefficient of Performance of Electromechanical Systems."

This is a video that demonstrates the principle that E= -dA/dt (partial derivatives) Where E=[V/m] Electric field and A=[Vs/m] Magnetic vector potential, which can also be thought of as the angular force. It turns out that this is the time derivative expression of E=vXB. B=magnetic field and v= velocity. The counter spinning copper tubes act as an eddy current would producing a counter magnetic field which levitated the magnet. So input velocity of the charges in copper create a time derivative function of E: E(input)=V(input)XB(output) so E= -dA/dt where B= curl A

This relates to the Wankel device in that the momentum of a magnet with p=mv (m-mass p-momentum) can induce current in a device and discharge that current again to keep rotation. Asymmetrical regauging involves an energy that can dissipate into a load and create a net force at the SAME time. So in this case the momentum of the magnets with B= curl A induces a current in the electromagnet. So E(out/in-when starting?)=v(in)XB(in-magnets) or E(out)= -dA(in)/dt
Thus the idea behind overunity or "free energy" systems is that we can take an input energy in resonance with an environmental energy and create a higher power (not energy) output than input.
This is what HEAT PUMPS already do! They are well known to have a coefficient of 3-5 in terms of heat transfer.